Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Musgrove v. Musgrove

Musgrove v. Musgrove

139 S.E.2d 315, 220 Ga. 390, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 562
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 5, 1964·No. 22663·Published

Opinion

Head, Presiding Justice.

The certificate of the trial judge does not amount to a certification that the bill of exceptions is true, but, on the contrary, shows that it is not true. “A certificate to a bill of exceptions, wherein the judge certifies that it is true, ‘except as hereinafter qualified/ and then adds the qualification after the close of the general certificate, does not amount to a certification that the bill of exceptions as written is true; and the writ of error must be dismissed.” Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Mills, 143 Ga. 47 (84 SE 120); Hatcher v. Smith & Gordon, 84 Ga. 451 (11 SE 1064); Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 SE 262); Adamson v. Bradley, 147 Ga. 328 (93 SE 894); Fischer v. Carpenter, 178 Ga. 224 (172 SE 464); Bentley v. Gordon, 188 Ga. 103 (2 SE2d 912); Beasley v. Georgia Power Co., 207 Ga. 188 (60 SE2d 363); Wofford v. Nance, 217 Ga. 640 (124 SE2d 72).

Writ of error dismissed.

AH the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Musgrove v. Musgrove, 139 S.E.2d 315, 220 Ga. 390, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 562 (Ga. 1964).

139 S.E.2d 315 (Musgrove v. Musgrove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beasley v. Georgia Power Co.
60 S.E.2d 363 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Hatcher v. Smith & Gordon
11 S.E. 1064 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1890)
Jarriel v. Jarriel
41 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Mills
84 S.E. 120 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Adamson v. Bradley
93 S.E. 894 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Fischer v. Carpenter
172 S.E. 464 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Bentley v. Gordon
2 S.E.2d 912 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Wofford v. Nance
124 S.E.2d 72 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)