Musgrove v. Musgrove
This text of 139 S.E.2d 315 (Musgrove v. Musgrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The certificate of the trial judge does not amount to a certification that the bill of exceptions is true, but, on the contrary, shows that it is not true. “A certificate to a bill of exceptions, wherein the judge certifies that it is true, ‘except as hereinafter qualified/ and then adds the qualification after the close of the general certificate, does not amount to a certification that the bill of exceptions as written is true; and the writ of error must be dismissed.” Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Mills, 143 Ga. 47 (84 SE 120); Hatcher v. Smith & Gordon, 84 Ga. 451 (11 SE 1064); Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 SE 262); Adamson v. Bradley, 147 Ga. 328 (93 SE 894); Fischer v. Carpenter, 178 Ga. 224 (172 SE 464); Bentley v. Gordon, 188 Ga. 103 (2 SE2d 912); Beasley v. Georgia Power Co., 207 Ga. 188 (60 SE2d 363); Wofford v. Nance, 217 Ga. 640 (124 SE2d 72).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.E.2d 315, 220 Ga. 390, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/musgrove-v-musgrove-ga-1964.