Adamson v. Bradley

93 S.E. 894, 147 Ga. 328, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 170
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 20, 1917·No. No. 242·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

“A certificate to a bill of exceptions, wherein, the judge certifies that it is true, ‘except as hereinafter qualified/ and then adds the qualification after the close of the general certificate, does not amount to a certification that the bill of exceptions as written is true; and the writ of error must be dismissed.” Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 S. E. 262) ; Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Mills, 143 Ga. 47 (84 S. E. 120). The certificate in the present case is substantially the same as that in the Jarriel case, supra; and it follows-that the writ of error must be dismissed. Love V. Love, 146 Ga. 160, 162 (91 S. E. 27).

Writ of error dismissed'.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., and Beck, P.J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adamson v. Bradley, 93 S.E. 894, 147 Ga. 328, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 170 (Ga. 1917).

93 S.E. 894 (Adamson v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Musgrove v. Musgrove
139 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Bentley v. Gordon
2 S.E.2d 912 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Fischer v. Carpenter
172 S.E. 464 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Eady v. Magnolia Cemetery Co.
166 S.E. 436 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Keough v. Georgia Power Co.
149 S.E. 435 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Jabaley v. State
105 S.E. 710 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Swafford v. Keaton
94 S.E. 568 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)