Swafford v. Keaton

94 S.E. 568, 147 Ga. 491, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 285
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1917
DocketNo. 444
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 568 (Swafford v. Keaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swafford v. Keaton, 94 S.E. 568, 147 Ga. 491, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 285 (Ga. 1917).

Opinion

Hiel, J.

Where in a certificate to the bill of exceptions the trial judge certifies that it is true, “except as noted on margin on page 24 & 25,” such certificate does not amount to a certification that the bill of exceptions as written is true; and under the principle ruled in Adamson v. Bradley, ante, 328 (93 S. E. 894), and eases therein cited, the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Writ of error; from Douglas. James & Bedgood, for plaintiff. J. B. Hutcheson and Astor Merritt, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jordan v. State
111 S.E. 417 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Hayes v. Chapman
95 S.E. 216 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 568, 147 Ga. 491, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swafford-v-keaton-ga-1917.