Swafford v. Keaton

94 S.E. 568, 147 Ga. 491, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 285
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 15, 1917·No. No. 444·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hiel, J.

Where in a certificate to the bill of exceptions the trial judge certifies that it is true, “except as noted on margin on page 24 & 25,” such certificate does not amount to a certification that the bill of exceptions as written is true; and under the principle ruled in Adamson v. Bradley, ante, 328 (93 S. E. 894), and eases therein cited, the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Writ of error; from Douglas. James & Bedgood, for plaintiff. J. B. Hutcheson and Astor Merritt, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swafford v. Keaton, 94 S.E. 568, 147 Ga. 491, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 285 (Ga. 1917).

94 S.E. 568 (Swafford v. Keaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jordan v. State
111 S.E. 417 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Hayes v. Chapman
95 S.E. 216 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)