Ho Yim v. William Barr
This text of Ho Yim v. William Barr (Ho Yim v. William Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 25 2020 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HO SANG YIM, AKA Alez Suk Peter No. 17-70624 Yim Yoon, Agency No. A037-993-102 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted June 5, 2020 Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and BENCIVENGO,** District Judge.
Ho Sang Yim petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals
order of removal. In a concurrently filed opinion, we hold that perjury under
section 118(a) of the California Penal Code is an “offense relating to . . . perjury”
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Cathy Ann Bencivengo, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. and is thus an “aggravated felony.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S). Yim was
convicted under section 118(a), and we therefore lack jurisdiction over his petition
for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C).
PETITION DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ho Yim v. William Barr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ho-yim-v-william-barr-ca9-2020.