FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 79
Perjury generally
18 U.S.C. § 1621
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter79 — PERJURY
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1621 (Perjury generally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1621.
Text
Whoever—
(1)having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
(2)in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;
is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or impriso
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
535 U.S. 137 (Supreme Court, 2002)
United States v. Gary Halbert
640 F.2d 1000 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Benjamin Craig Long v. Bando Manufacturing of America, Inc.
201 F.3d 754 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Veal
153 F.3d 1233 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
In Re Goffe
641 A.2d 458 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1994)
United States v. Mounts
35 F.3d 1208 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Orville S. Clavey
565 F.2d 111 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Hawthorne
316 F.3d 1140 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
William Alfred Reno v. United States
317 F.2d 499 (Fifth Circuit, 1963)
Blinka v. Washington State Bar Ass'n
36 P.3d 1094 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2001)
ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Khan
2 F.3d 484 (Second Circuit, 1993)
United States v. McCarthy
11 C.M.A. 758 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1960)
Sutton v. United States Small Business Administration
92 F. App'x 112 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Nessanbaum
205 F.2d 93 (Third Circuit, 1953)
Harry Harold Chereton v. United States
286 F.2d 409 (Sixth Circuit, 1961)
United States v. Jose Antonio Rivera
448 F.2d 757 (Seventh Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Thompson
808 F.3d 190 (Second Circuit, 2015)
Rantala v. State
216 P.3d 550 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 2009)
United States v. Barry Bonds
784 F.3d 582 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. John Wesson
478 F.2d 1180 (Seventh Circuit, 1973)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 773; Pub. L. 88–619, §1, Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 995; Pub. L. 94–550, §2, Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2534; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§231, 629 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §125, 35 Stat. 1111; June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XI, §19, 40 Stat. 230).
Words "except as otherwise expressly provided by law" were inserted to avoid conflict with perjury provisions in other titles where the punishment and application vary.
More than 25 additional provisions are in the code. For construction and application of several such sections, see Behrle v. United States (App. D.C. 1938, 100 F. 2d 714), United States v. Hammer (D.C.N.Y., 1924, 299 F. 1011, affirmed, 6 F. 2d 786), Rosenthal v. United States (1918, 248 F. 684, 160 C.C.A. 584), cf. Epstein v. United States (1912, 196 F. 354, 116 C.C.A. 174, certiorari denied 32 S. Ct. 527, 223 U.S. 731, 56 L. ed. 634).
Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.
Minor verbal changes were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000" in concluding provisions.
1976—Pub. L. 94–550 divided existing provisions into a single introductory word "Whoever", par. (1), and closing provisions following par. (2), and added par. (2).
1964—Pub. L. 88–619 inserted at end "This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§231, 629 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §125, 35 Stat. 1111; June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XI, §19, 40 Stat. 230).
Words "except as otherwise expressly provided by law" were inserted to avoid conflict with perjury provisions in other titles where the punishment and application vary.
More than 25 additional provisions are in the code. For construction and application of several such sections, see Behrle v. United States (App. D.C. 1938, 100 F. 2d 714), United States v. Hammer (D.C.N.Y., 1924, 299 F. 1011, affirmed, 6 F. 2d 786), Rosenthal v. United States (1918, 248 F. 684, 160 C.C.A. 584), cf. Epstein v. United States (1912, 196 F. 354, 116 C.C.A. 174, certiorari denied 32 S. Ct. 527, 223 U.S. 731, 56 L. ed. 634).
Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.
Minor verbal changes were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000" in concluding provisions.
1976—Pub. L. 94–550 divided existing provisions into a single introductory word "Whoever", par. (1), and closing provisions following par. (2), and added par. (2).
1964—Pub. L. 88–619 inserted at end "This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1621.