Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller
This text of 644 S.E.2d 7 (Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Miriam GORE, Employee
v.
MYRTLE/MUELLER, Employer
Travelers Insurance Company, Carrier.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Leah L. King, for Miriam Gore.
Dana C. Moody, Thomas M. Morrow, Raleigh, for Myrtle/Mueller, et al.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of August 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.
Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
644 S.E.2d 7, 361 N.C. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gore-v-myrtlemueller-nc-2007.