Edgar v. Citraro
This text of 112 Cal. App. 761 (Edgar v. Citraro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs obtained a judgment for dam ages against both of the defendants in the above-entitled action, and the latter took separate appeals which are presented on separate records. On the companion appeal, taken by the defendant Citraro, which we have this day held to be without merit (Edgar v. Citraro (No. 7069), ante, p. 183 [297 Pac. 653]), we considered also and determined adversely all questions raised by the defendant Pratt on the present appeal. The judgment as to the defendant Pratt is therefore affirmed.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on March 27, 1931, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 23, 1931.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 Cal. App. 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgar-v-citraro-calctapp-1931.