Edgar v. Citraro

297 P. 652, 112 Cal. App. 762, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1083
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edgar v. Citraro. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Cal. App. 163
California Court of Appeal·Decided February 25, 1931·No. Docket No. 6905.·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

This appeal, taken by the defendant Pratt from the judgment for damages entered herein against both defendants, after verdict by a jury, is companion to the one taken by the defendant Citraro from the same judgment, the appeals having been presented on separate records. [1] We have this day determined the latter appeal adversely to the contentions of the appellant therein (Edgar v. Citraro, (No. 7070), ante, p. 178 [297 P. 654]), and in our decision therein we disposed also of all of the contentions made by the defendant Pratt on the present appeal. Therefore, upon the grounds therein stated, the judgment as to the defendant Pratt is affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on March 27, 1931, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 23, 1931. *Page 763

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edgar v. Citraro, 297 P. 652, 112 Cal. App. 762, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1083 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

297 P. 652 (Edgar v. Citraro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgar v. Citraro
297 P. 654 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)