Edgar v. Citraro

283 P. 124, 102 Cal. App. 795, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 128
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edgar v. Citraro. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Cal. App. 163
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 16, 1929·No. Docket No. 7070.·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

Respondents move this court to strike the transcript on appeal and appellant's opening brief from the files of this court and to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that said transcript was transmitted to this court in violation of an order theretofore made by the Superior Court terminating the proceedings to procure the transcript. [1] The motion is based upon the identical facts and circumstances involved in a similar motion made by respondents in a companion case, and which motion has this day been denied. (Edgar et al. v. Citraro et al. (No. 7069) *Page 796 ante, p. 545 [283 P. 123].) Therefore, upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the decision in the companion proceeding, the motion herein is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edgar v. Citraro, 283 P. 124, 102 Cal. App. 795, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 128 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

283 P. 124 (Edgar v. Citraro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgar v. Citraro
283 P. 123 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)