Edgar v. Citraro

102 Cal. App. 795
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 16, 1929
DocketCiv. No. 7070
StatusPublished

This text of 102 Cal. App. 795 (Edgar v. Citraro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edgar v. Citraro, 102 Cal. App. 795 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Respondents move this court to strike the transcript on appeal and appellant’s opening brief from the files of this court and to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that said transcript was transmitted to this court in violation of an order theretofore made by the Superior Court terminating the proceedings to procure the transcript. The motion is based upon the identical facts and circumstances involved in a similar motion made by respondents in a companion case, and which motion has this day been denied. (Edgar et al. v. Citraro et al. (No. 7069) [796]*796ante, p. 545 [283 Pac. 123].) Therefore, upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the decision in the companion proceeding, the motion herein is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edgar v. Citraro
283 P. 123 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Cal. App. 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgar-v-citraro-calctapp-1929.