Edgar v. Citraro

297 P. 652, 112 Cal. App. 761, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1084
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edgar v. Citraro. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Cal. App. 163
California Court of Appeal·Decided February 25, 1931·No. Docket No. 6916.·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASES.
THE COURT.

Plaintiffs obtained a judgment for damages against both of the defendants in the above-entitled action, and the latter took separate appeals which are presented on separate records. [1] On the companion appeal, taken by the defendant Citraro, which we have this day held to be without merit (Edgar v. Citraro (No. 7069), ante, p. 183 [297 P. 653]), we considered also and determined adversely all questions raised by the defendant Pratt on the present appeal. The judgment as to the defendant Pratt is therefore affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on March 27, 1931, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 23, 1931. *Page 762

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edgar v. Citraro, 297 P. 652, 112 Cal. App. 761, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1084 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

297 P. 652 (Edgar v. Citraro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgar v. Citraro
297 P. 653 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)