Dove v. Maxwell
This text of 191 S.E. 916 (Dove v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill of exceptions as brought by the defendant assigns error only upon a judgment sustaining demurrers to the answer and cross-bill of the defendant and dismissing the same. Held:
1. The judgment complained of is not such a final judgment as may bo reviewed by direct bill of exceptions. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. Bellinger v. Eblin, 158 Ga. 657 (124 S. E. 137); White v. Chisolm, 160 Ga. 177 (127 S. E. 140); Daniel v. Chastaine, 177 Ga. 730 (2) (171 S. E. 373); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 (188 S. E. 699).
2. The request for leave, to treat the official copy of the bill of exceptions of file in the court below as exceptions pendente lite is denied. United Glass Co. v. McConnell, 110 Ga. 616 (2) (36 S. E. 58); Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (2) (37 S. E. 364); Berryman v. Haden, 112 Ga. 752 (4) (38 S. E. 53); Drake v. Drake, 181 Ga. 844 (184 S. E. 699); [461]*461Thomasville Iron Works v. Clark, 16 Ga. App. 537 (2) (85 S. E. 674); Hines v. Jolly, 24 Ga. App. 201 (100 S. E. 638).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 S.E. 916, 184 Ga. 460, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dove-v-maxwell-ga-1937.