Allen v. A. A. A. Finance Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Allen v. A. A. A. Finance Co.

116 S.E.2d 512, 102 Ga. App. 377, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 625

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 12, 1960

Docket38419

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E.2d 512 (Allen v. A. A. A. Finance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. A. A. A. Finance Co., 116 S.E.2d 512, 102 Ga. App. 377, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 625 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Judge.

This appeal is brought before final disposition of the cause by a direct bill of exceptions based solely upon error assigned on the sustaining of a general demurrer to the answer and cross-action and their dismissal. No motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions was made by the defendant in error.

'A judgment sustaining a plaintiff’s demurrer to an answer and cross-action filed by a defendant can not be reviewed by a direct bill of exceptions before the final disposition of the case in the court below. Since this cause has not terminated finally in the trial court, it is before us prematurely. Accordingly, this court will dismiss the writ of error. Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224-230 (Code Ann. § 6-701); Dove v. Maxwell, 184 Ga. 460 (191 S. E. 916); Bowman v. Poole, 212 Ga. 697 (95 S. E. 2d 375).

Writ of error dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Judge.

This appeal is brought before final disposition of the cause by a direct bill of exceptions based solely upon error assigned on the sustaining of a general demurrer to the answer and cross-action and their dismissal. No motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions was made by the defendant in error.

'A judgment sustaining a plaintiff’s demurrer to an answer and cross-action filed by a defendant can not be reviewed by a direct bill of exceptions before the final disposition of the case in the court below. Since this cause has not terminated finally in the trial court, it is before us prematurely. Accordingly, this court will dismiss the writ of error. Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224-230 (Code Ann. § 6-701); Dove v. Maxwell, 184 Ga. 460 (191 S. E. 916); Bowman v. Poole, 212 Ga. 697 (95 S. E. 2d 375).

Writ of error dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E.2d 512, 102 Ga. App. 377, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-a-a-a-finance-co-gactapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack