Hood v. Akins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hood v. Akins

152 S.E.2d 704, 114 Ga. App. 733, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 903

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 2, 1966

Docket42396

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 152 S.E.2d 704 (Hood v. Akins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hood v. Akins, 152 S.E.2d 704, 114 Ga. App. 733, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 903 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Jordan, Judge.

An order of the trial judge sustaining plaintiff’s oral motion to strike an amended answer and cross action as barred by the statute of limitation, leaves the case pending in the court below and is not a final judgment from which an appeal will lie. Dove v. Maxwell, 184 Ga. 460 (191 SE 916); Code Ann. § 6-701. The appeal must be dismissed pursuant to Section 13 (b) of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 493, 500). Birdwell v. *734 Pippen, 113 Ga. App. 202 (147 SE2d 673). See Darden v. Roberts, 193 Ga. 637 (19 SE2d 270); Sanders v. Sanders, 212 Ga. 244 (91 SE2d 604), and cases cited therein for numerous rulings to the same effect.

Argued November 9, 1966 Decided December 2, 1966. Jess H. Watson, for appellant. Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Ralph H. Hicks, Hoke Smith, Sam F. Lowe, Jr., for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan, Judge.

An order of the trial judge sustaining plaintiff’s oral motion to strike an amended answer and cross action as barred by the statute of limitation, leaves the case pending in the court below and is not a final judgment from which an appeal will lie. Dove v. Maxwell, 184 Ga. 460 (191 SE 916); Code Ann. § 6-701. The appeal must be dismissed pursuant to Section 13 (b) of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 493, 500). Birdwell v. *734 Pippen, 113 Ga. App. 202 (147 SE2d 673). See Darden v. Roberts, 193 Ga. 637 (19 SE2d 270); Sanders v. Sanders, 212 Ga. 244 (91 SE2d 604), and cases cited therein for numerous rulings to the same effect.

Argued November 9, 1966 Decided December 2, 1966. Jess H. Watson, for appellant. Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Ralph H. Hicks, Hoke Smith, Sam F. Lowe, Jr., for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 S.E.2d 704, 114 Ga. App. 733, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-akins-gactapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack