Bowman v. Berlin
164 S.E.2d 149, 118 Ga. App. 511, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 950
This text of 164 S.E.2d 149 (Bowman v. Berlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bowman v. Berlin, 164 S.E.2d 149, 118 Ga. App. 511, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 950 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).
Opinion
The striking of an answer or of an amendment thereto is not a final judgment from which an appeal will lie. Norbo Trading Corp. v. Wohlmuth, 223 Ga. 258 (154 SE2d 224); Hood v. Akins, 114 Ga. App. 733 (152 SE2d 704).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lowe v. Payne
203 S.E.2d 309 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Thompson v. Consumer Credit of Valdosta, Inc.
180 S.E.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 S.E.2d 149, 118 Ga. App. 511, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-berlin-gactapp-1968.