Sanders v. Sanders

91 S.E.2d 604, 212 Ga. 244, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 329
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 1956
Docket19216
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 91 S.E.2d 604 (Sanders v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Sanders, 91 S.E.2d 604, 212 Ga. 244, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 329 (Ga. 1956).

Opinion

Wyatt, Presiding Justice.

Defendant in error brought suit against plaintiff in error, seeking to recover a deficiency judgment on a bid for the sale of land which plaintiff in error made at a public sale, and with which he failed to comply. Plaintiff in error filed a cross-bill seeking an accounting against the defendant in error as administrator, and seeking to recover certain alleged income which the administrator had received from the *245 estate represented, by him and for which he had not accounted. Plaintiff in error offered a number of amendments to his cross-bill, which were finally disallowed and the cross-bill was dismissed on general demurrer. Held:

Submitted January 10, 1956 Decided February 14, 1956 Motion to Transfer or for Direction Denied February 29, 1956. L. L. Woodward, Gower & McCormick, for plaintiff in error. Davis & Friedin, J. W. Sanders, contra.

The exception here is to the disallowing of certain amendments to the cross-bill and to the sustaining of the general demurrer to the cross-bill and dismissing same. It has consistently been held by this court that the dismissal of a cross-bill on general demurrer is not a final disposition of the cause under the provisions of Code § 6-701. See, in this connection, Cook County v. Thornhill Wagon Co., 186 Ga. 835 (199 S. E. 117); Dove v. Maxwell, 184 Ga. 460 (191 S. E. 916); Byrd v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 184 Ga. 178 (190 S. E. 584); Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Teirell, 155 Ga. 374 (116 S. E. 793). It follows, this writ of error is premature, and this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the questions presented therein. The writ of error is accordingly

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norbo Trading Corporation v. Wohlmuth
154 S.E.2d 224 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Hood v. Akins
152 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Chemetron Corp. v. Southern Nitrogen Co.
117 S.E.2d 180 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Williams v. KWIK SHAKE DISPENSER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
105 S.E.2d 457 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E.2d 604, 212 Ga. 244, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-sanders-ga-1956.