Sanders v. Sanders
This text of 91 S.E.2d 604 (Sanders v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant in error brought suit against plaintiff in error, seeking to recover a deficiency judgment on a bid for the sale of land which plaintiff in error made at a public sale, and with which he failed to comply. Plaintiff in error filed a cross-bill seeking an accounting against the defendant in error as administrator, and seeking to recover certain alleged income which the administrator had received from the *245 estate represented, by him and for which he had not accounted. Plaintiff in error offered a number of amendments to his cross-bill, which were finally disallowed and the cross-bill was dismissed on general demurrer. Held:
The exception here is to the disallowing of certain amendments to the cross-bill and to the sustaining of the general demurrer to the cross-bill and dismissing same. It has consistently been held by this court that the dismissal of a cross-bill on general demurrer is not a final disposition of the cause under the provisions of Code § 6-701. See, in this connection, Cook County v. Thornhill Wagon Co., 186 Ga. 835 (199 S. E. 117); Dove v. Maxwell, 184 Ga. 460 (191 S. E. 916); Byrd v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 184 Ga. 178 (190 S. E. 584); Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Teirell, 155 Ga. 374 (116 S. E. 793). It follows, this writ of error is premature, and this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the questions presented therein. The writ of error is accordingly
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E.2d 604, 212 Ga. 244, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-sanders-ga-1956.