Snelling v. Decker
This text of 98 S.E.2d 125 (Snelling v. Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff filed demurrers to the defendant’s answer, and filed certain other motions to strike certain portions of the answer. The court overruled the demurrers and the motions. This court held in Sundy v. Allgood, 93 Ga. App. 741 (92 S. E. 2d 726): “The bill of exceptions assigns error only upon a judgment overruling demurrers to the answer and cross-bill of the defendant. Held: 1. The judgment complained of is not a final judgment, and therefore cannot be reviewed by direct bill of exceptions. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. Dove v. Maxwell, 184 Ga. 460 (1) (191 S. E. 916); Carver v. Bone, 73 Ga. App. 550 (37 S. E. 2d 371).”
The judgment of which complaint is made in the instant case is not a final judgment and cannot be reviewed by this court.
Bill of exceptions dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 S.E.2d 125, 95 Ga. App. 541, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snelling-v-decker-gactapp-1957.