Clanton v. Harden

29 S.E.2d 520, 70 Ga. App. 735, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 92
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1944
Docket30370.
StatusPublished

This text of 29 S.E.2d 520 (Clanton v. Harden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clanton v. Harden, 29 S.E.2d 520, 70 Ga. App. 735, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 92 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

Parker, J.

The bill of exceptions assigns error only on the sustaining of a demurrer to the answer of the defendant, which ruling was not a final judgment. Therefore the bill of exceptions was premature, and this court having no jurisdiction to entertain it, the writ of error must be dismissed. Edison v. Dundee Woolen Mills, 18 Ga. App. 460 (89 S. E. 536); Dove v. Maxwell, 184 Ga. 460 (191 S. E. 916).

Writ of error dismissed.

Sutton, P. J., and Felton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dove v. Maxwell
191 S.E. 916 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Edison v. Dundee Woolen Mills
89 S.E. 536 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E.2d 520, 70 Ga. App. 735, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clanton-v-harden-gactapp-1944.