Edison v. Dundee Woolen Mills

89 S.E. 536, 18 Ga. App. 460, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1022
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 19, 1916
Docket7285
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 536 (Edison v. Dundee Woolen Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edison v. Dundee Woolen Mills, 89 S.E. 536, 18 Ga. App. 460, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1022 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Hodges, J.

The bill of exceptions in this case relates only to interlocutory matter, and there was no final judgment. The writ of error was therefore premature, and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain it. Direction is given, however, that the copy of the bill of excep[461]*461tions, of file in the office of the clerk of the city court of Atlanta, may operate as exceptions pendente lite.

Decided July 19, 1916. Attachment; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. January 8, 1916. Smith, Hammond & Smith, for plaintiff. C. B. Rosser Jr., for defendant.

Writ of error dismissed, with direction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spell v. State
170 S.E.2d 701 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Clanton v. Harden
29 S.E.2d 520 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 536, 18 Ga. App. 460, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-v-dundee-woolen-mills-gactapp-1916.