Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banks

Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banks

188 S.E. 699, 183 Ga. 497, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 264
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1936
DocketNo. 11408
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 188 S.E. 699 (Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banks, 188 S.E. 699, 183 Ga. 497, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 264 (Ga. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The bill of exceptions as brought by the defendant assigns error only upon exceptions pendente lite as taken to the overruling of a demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition, and upon an order striking the defendants’ plea in abatement. Held-. '

1. “The losing party to a judgment on general demurrer is given the option to sue out a direct bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment, or to have certified and filed exceptions pendente lite. If the latter course be followed, the ruling on demurrer becomes a pendente-lite ruling which is reviewable only after the termination of the case, on exceptions taken to the final judgment rendered therein. Civil Code (1910), [498]*498§ 6138” (1933, § 6-701). Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 (79 S. E. 841); Durrence v. Waters, 143 Ga. 223 ( 84 S. E. 471); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 (135 S. E. 505).

No. 11408. November 12, 1936. Rehearing denied December 11, 1936. Dmis & Frieden, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Woodward and Bennet & Peacoclc, contra.

2. An order striking- a plea in abatement is not a final judgment, nor would a judgment thereon have been a final disposition of the cause “if it had been rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error.” Code, § 6-701; Ross v. Mercer, 115 Ga. 353 (41 S. E. 594); Johnson v. Battle, 120 Ga. 649 (48 S. E. 128); English v. Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga. 745 (105 S. E. 292); Crider v. Harris, 181 Ga. 555 (182 S. E. 592).

3. It follows that the bill of exceptions is premature, and must be dismissed. While no motion to dismiss has been made, it is the duty of this court to take notice of its own lack of jurisdiction; and the failure to assign error upon a final judgment is a defect relating to jurisdiction. Johnson v. Battle, 120 Ga. supra; Welborne v. State, 114 Ga. 793 (40 S. E. 857); Vanzant v. First National Bank, 164 Ga. 772 (2-a) (139 S. E. 537); Malsby v. Shipp, 177 Ga. 54 (3) (169 S. E. 308).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kitchens v. State
144 S.E.2d 368 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Byram v. State Highway Department
119 S.E.2d 129 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Smith v. State
104 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Clark v. Associates Discount Corp.
85 S.E.2d 777 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Malcom v. Webb
75 S.E.2d 801 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Shirley v. State
68 S.E.2d 597 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Cordele Sash, Door & Lumber Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
66 S.E.2d 767 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Crews v. Crews
61 S.E.2d 144 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Adams v. Adams
59 S.E.2d 375 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Story v. City of MacOn
45 S.E.2d 196 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Clements v. Hollingsworth
44 S.E.2d 381 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Smith v. Barksdale
35 S.E.2d 149 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Booker v. Harris
33 S.E.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Fitzgerald Cotton Mills v. Murray
26 S.E.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
C. I. T. Corporation v. Smith
23 S.E.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Womack v. Williford
22 S.E.2d 510 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Carpenter v. State Ex Rel. Hains
21 S.E.2d 643 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Darden v. Roberts
19 S.E.2d 270 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Byrd v. Goodman
15 S.E.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Henderson v. Anderson
3 S.E.2d 97 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 S.E. 699, 183 Ga. 497, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-tippens-superintendent-of-banks-ga-1936.