Crider v. Harris
182 S.E. 592, 181 Ga. 555, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 162
Opinions
The bill of exceptions complains only of the direction of a verdict in favor of a plea of res judicata.. This was not such a final judgment as will support a direct bill of exceptions as contemplated by the Code of 1933, § 6-701. English v. Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga. 745 (105 S. E. 292).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crider v. Harris, 182 S.E. 592, 181 Ga. 555, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 162 (Ga. 1935).
182 S.E. 592 (Crider v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stanton v. Stanton
93 S.E.2d 770 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Snell v. Lopez
86 S.E.2d 363 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
H. W. Brown Transportation Co. v. Edgeworth
84 S.E.2d 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Forbes
44 S.E.2d 692 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Loveless v. McCollum
5 S.E.2d 582 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Martin v. Green
4 S.E.2d 137 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Rabhan v. Rabhan
195 S.E. 193 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Garman v. City of Atlanta
191 S.E. 164 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banks
188 S.E. 699 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)