Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

430 S.W.3d 357, 2014 WL 2101486, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 582

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 946 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2014·No. No. WD 76260·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Edward Brown appeals from the Circuit Court of Randolph County’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for [358]*358our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Edward Brown appeals from the Circuit Court of Randolph County’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for [358]*358our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Brown v. State, 430 S.W.3d 357, 2014 WL 2101486, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 582 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

430 S.W.3d 357 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.