Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

357 S.W.3d 318, 2012 WL 265937, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 123

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 2012·No. WD 73515·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Brown alleges that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him: (1) that he could seek to withdraw his earlier jury-trial waiver; and (2) that his guilty plea would waive his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the *319 reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Brown alleges that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him: (1) that he could seek to withdraw his earlier jury-trial waiver; and (2) that his guilty plea would waive his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the *319 reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Brown v. State, 357 S.W.3d 318, 2012 WL 265937, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

357 S.W.3d 318 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related