Dossett v. Peters

357 S.W.3d 318, 2012 WL 265928, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 126
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 31, 2012
DocketWD 73430
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 357 S.W.3d 318 (Dossett v. Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dossett v. Peters, 357 S.W.3d 318, 2012 WL 265928, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 126 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Dossett, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s judgment that dismissed his petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Dossett claims on appeal that the trial court erred in dismissing his petition because he adequately pleaded the elements of negligence, legal malpractice, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
357 S.W.3d 318 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 S.W.3d 318, 2012 WL 265928, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dossett-v-peters-moctapp-2012.