Brown v. State
372 S.W.3d 886, 2012 WL 3089319, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 937
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 946 →
Opinion
ORDER
Jimmy Brown appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 372 S.W.3d 886, 2012 WL 3089319, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 937 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
372 S.W.3d 886 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.