Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

307 S.W.3d 680, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 305, 2010 WL 932596

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

DocketED 92590

StatusPublished

This text of 307 S.W.3d 680 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 307 S.W.3d 680, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 305, 2010 WL 932596 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Samuel L. Brown, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Samuel L. Brown, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 S.W.3d 680, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 305, 2010 WL 932596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack