Brown v. State

359 S.W.3d 568, 2012 WL 612363, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 252
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 946
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2012·No. No. WD 74010·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. He contends the record does not conclusively refute his claims that plea counsel coerced him into pleading guilty by failing to investigate and prepare his proposed defense and that plea counsel misad-vised him about the length of his sentence. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 359 S.W.3d 568, 2012 WL 612363, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 252 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

359 S.W.3d 568 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.