Brown v. State

381 S.W.3d 404, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1305, 2012 WL 4888324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 946
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 98032·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward L. Brown appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 381 S.W.3d 404, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1305, 2012 WL 4888324 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

381 S.W.3d 404 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.