Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

395 S.W.3d 83, 2013 WL 1412106, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 436

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 946 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 2013·No. No. ED 98129·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Deraughn Brown, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Deraughn Brown, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Brown v. State, 395 S.W.3d 83, 2013 WL 1412106, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 436 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

395 S.W.3d 83 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.