Brown v. State

397 S.W.3d 52, 2013 WL 1729609, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 496
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 946
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 23, 2013·No. No. WD 74742·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jawanza Brown appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 397 S.W.3d 52, 2013 WL 1729609, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 496 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

397 S.W.3d 52 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.