Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman
Opinion
Order entered March 21, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV
BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant
V.
JAMES VAN SICKLE, KARL- THOMAS MUSSELMAN, ET AL, Appellee
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275
ORDER Based on the filings before us and civil practice and remedies code section 27.008, we
DENY appellees Karl-Thomas Musselman d/b/a Burnt Orange Report and Katherine
Haenschen’s “motion to dismiss, or in the alternative to abate, for lack of jurisdiction.” See TEX.
CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 27.008(b), (c) (West Supp. 2012).
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman (Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.