Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 26, 2013·No. 05-13-00191-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered November 26, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER We GRANT appellant’s November 21, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time

to file a reply brief. Appellant shall file his reply brief on or before January 9, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered November 26, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER We GRANT appellant’s November 21, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time

to file a reply brief. Appellant shall file his reply brief on or before January 9, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman (Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.