Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 9, 2013·No. 05-13-00191-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered July 9, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s motion to withdraw appellant’s brief. The Court

GRANTS the motion and DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to remove appellant’s brief from the

file in this case. Appellant is ORDERED to file his brief within thirty days after the

supplemental court reporter’s record is filed in this case. The Court also has before it appellant’s

motion to file a brief in excess of the word count limit. The motion is DENIED as moot.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman (Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.