Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 11, 2013·No. 05-13-00191-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered April 11, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER The Court has before it the parties’ April 9, 2013 agreed motion for extension of time to

file appellant’s and appellees’ briefs. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant

to file his brief by May 16, 2013. The Court further ORDERS appellees to file their briefs

within fifty days of the date appellant files his brief.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered April 11, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER The Court has before it the parties’ April 9, 2013 agreed motion for extension of time to

file appellant’s and appellees’ briefs. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant

to file his brief by May 16, 2013. The Court further ORDERS appellees to file their briefs

within fifty days of the date appellant files his brief.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman (Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.