Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 14, 2013·No. 05-13-00191-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered May 14, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s May 10, 2013 unopposed motion for extension of

time to file his brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant to file his brief

by June 17, 2013. No further extensions will be granted without a showing of exceptional

circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered May 14, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s May 10, 2013 unopposed motion for extension of

time to file his brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant to file his brief

by June 17, 2013. No further extensions will be granted without a showing of exceptional

circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman (Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.