Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman
Opinion
Order entered June 17, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV
BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant
V.
JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275
ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s June 13, 2013 third unopposed motion for extension
of time to file his brief. On May 14, 2013, this Court informed appellant that no further
extensions would be granted without a showing of exceptional circumstances. Appellant’s
motion does not demonstrate any such circumstances, and the Court therefore DENIES the
motion and ORDERS appellant to file his brief within ten days of the date of this order. If
appellant fails to do so, this case may be dismissed without further notice.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman (Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.