Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 17, 2013·No. 05-13-00191-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 17, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s June 13, 2013 third unopposed motion for extension

of time to file his brief. On May 14, 2013, this Court informed appellant that no further

extensions would be granted without a showing of exceptional circumstances. Appellant’s

motion does not demonstrate any such circumstances, and the Court therefore DENIES the

motion and ORDERS appellant to file his brief within ten days of the date of this order. If

appellant fails to do so, this case may be dismissed without further notice.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman (Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.