Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 19, 2013·No. 05-13-00191-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered August 19, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s August 15, 2013 “amended unopposed motion for

leave to file appellant’s brief in excess of word count and page limits imposed by the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court.” We DENY the motion.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered August 19, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s August 15, 2013 “amended unopposed motion for

leave to file appellant’s brief in excess of word count and page limits imposed by the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court.” We DENY the motion.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman (Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, Karl- Thomas Musselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.