Baldwin v. Crosby
This text of 905 So. 2d 250 (Baldwin v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Donald S. BALDWIN, Petitioner,
v.
James V. CROSBY, Jr., Secretary, Department of Corrections, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Donald S. Baldwin, petitioner, pro se.
No appearance for respondent.
*251 PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of mandamus, Donald S. Baldwin seeks an order compelling the circuit court to remove a lien placed on his inmate trust account pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes, and the restoration of all funds collected pursuant to that lien. We conclude that Baldwin's proper remedy is to file a motion in the circuit court seeking this relief, secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any final order in the proceedings below. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus on the merits, without prejudice to seeking relief in the circuit court.
WOLF, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
905 So. 2d 250, 2005 WL 1467912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2005.