Pate v. State, Department of Corrections
226 So. 3d 284, 2017 WL 2126615
Opinion
DISMISSED. Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (concluding “proper remedy is to file a motion in the circuit court seeking [removal of lien and restoration of funds collected], secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought' of any final order in the proceedings below”). The petition for writ of prohibition, transferred from Florida Supreme Court case number SC17-0395, is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pate v. State, Department of Corrections, 226 So. 3d 284, 2017 WL 2126615 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
226 So. 3d 284 (Pate v. State, Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Baldwin v. Crosby
905 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)