Cooks v. State, Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cooks v. State, Department of Corrections

905 So. 2d 250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9731, 2005 WL 1467898

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 2005

DocketNo. 1D05-1716

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 905 So. 2d 250 (Cooks v. State, Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooks v. State, Department of Corrections, 905 So. 2d 250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9731, 2005 WL 1467898 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tareyan Cooks seeks mandamus relief with respect to two proceedings in the circuit court, but as best we can discern from the allegations of the petition and the supporting-documentation provided by petitioner, one of those proceedings was dismissed without prejudice based on petitioner’s failure to provide documentation necessary to determine his entitlement to relief, and the other was dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or secure an order of insolvency. Petitioner fails to show that he has either cured the pleading deficiency identified in the former case, or resolved the fee issue as to the latter case. He therefore fails to demonstrate a prima facie basis for the granting of mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as legally insufficient.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED.

WOLF, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Tareyan Cooks seeks mandamus relief with respect to two proceedings in the circuit court, but as best we can discern from the allegations of the petition and the supporting-documentation provided by petitioner, one of those proceedings was dismissed without prejudice based on petitioner’s failure to provide documentation necessary to determine his entitlement to relief, and the other was dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or secure an order of insolvency. Petitioner fails to show that he has either cured the pleading deficiency identified in the former case, or resolved the fee issue as to the latter case. He therefore fails to demonstrate a prima facie basis for the granting of mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as legally insufficient.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED.

WOLF, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

905 So. 2d 250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9731, 2005 WL 1467898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooks-v-state-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack