LaFlower v. Inzer

60 So. 3d 406, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15682, 2010 WL 6619317
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 5, 2010
DocketNo. 1D10-3543
StatusPublished

This text of 60 So. 3d 406 (LaFlower v. Inzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaFlower v. Inzer, 60 So. 3d 406, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15682, 2010 WL 6619317 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baldwin v. Crosby
905 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 So. 3d 406, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15682, 2010 WL 6619317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laflower-v-inzer-fladistctapp-2010.