Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ramirez v. Department of Corrections

Ramirez v. Department of Corrections

225 So. 3d 397, 2017 WL 3584074, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11953
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 21, 2017
DocketCASE NO. 1D17-0626
StatusPublished

This text of 225 So. 3d 397 (Ramirez v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramirez v. Department of Corrections, 225 So. 3d 397, 2017 WL 3584074, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11953 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s motion for clarification filed on May 3/2017, is treated as a motion to dismiss and is granted. This proceeding is treated as a premature appeal and is dismissed. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (concluding “proper remedy is to file a motion in the circuit court seeking [removal of lien and restoration of funds collected], secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any final order in the proceedings below”). .

WINOKUR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Baldwin v. Crosby
905 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 So. 3d 397, 2017 WL 3584074, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2017.