Gene Ramirez v. Department of Corrections
This text of Gene Ramirez v. Department of Corrections (Gene Ramirez v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
GENE RAMIREZ, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D17-0626
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent. ___________________________/
Opinion filed August 21, 2017.
Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.
Gene Ramirez, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lateasha L. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Respondent’s motion for clarification filed on May 3, 2017, is treated as a
motion to dismiss and is granted. This proceeding is treated as a premature appeal and
is dismissed. See Banks v. State, 916 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Baldwin v.
Crosby, 905 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (concluding “proper remedy is to file a motion in the circuit court seeking [removal of lien and restoration of funds collected],
secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any
final order in the proceedings below”).
WINOKUR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gene Ramirez v. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gene-ramirez-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2017.