Gene Ramirez v. Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 27, 2017·No. 17-0626·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

GENE RAMIREZ, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D17-0626

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

Opinion filed August 21, 2017. Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction. Gene Ramirez, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lateasha L. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s motion for clarification filed on May 3, 2017, is treated as a motion to dismiss and is granted. This proceeding is treated as a premature appeal and is dismissed. See Banks v. State, 916 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (concluding “proper remedy is to file a

motion in the circuit court seeking [removal of lien and restoration of funds collected], secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any final order in the proceedings below”). WINOKUR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gene Ramirez v. Department of Corrections, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Gene Ramirez v. Department of Corrections (Gene Ramirez v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Baldwin v. Crosby
905 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)