Spaulding v. Department of Corrections

111 So. 3d 303, 2013 WL 1749506, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6630
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2013·No. No. 1D13-0929·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (concluding “proper remedy is to file a motion in the circuit court seeking [removal of lien and restoration of funds collected], secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any final order in the proceedings below”).

PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spaulding v. Department of Corrections, 111 So. 3d 303, 2013 WL 1749506, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6630 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

111 So. 3d 303 (Spaulding v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Baldwin v. Crosby
905 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)