Albert J. Jansen, Doing Business as Mercury Service v. The United States

344 F.2d 363, 170 Ct. Cl. 346, 1965 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 228
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedApril 16, 1965
Docket78-62
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 344 F.2d 363 (Albert J. Jansen, Doing Business as Mercury Service v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert J. Jansen, Doing Business as Mercury Service v. The United States, 344 F.2d 363, 170 Ct. Cl. 346, 1965 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 228 (cc 1965).

Opinion

COWEN, Chief Judge.

This is an action to recover amounts allegedly due plaintiff under two Air Force contracts. The issue presented for our decision is the interpretation of the payment formula included in the contracts. While two separate contracts are in issue, both present the same issue of law and they will be discussed jointly.

On June 18, 1958, plaintiff was awarded contract AF 45 (603)-441 (hereinafter referred to as No. 441), which was an estimated requirements contract to *365 provide the services necessary for the cleaning of C-118 and C-124 type aircraft at McChord Air Force Base, Washington, for the year, July 1, 1958-June 30, 1959. On February 13, 1959, plaintiff was awarded contract AF 45(631)— 315 (hereafter referred to as No. 315), which called for the performance of similar services for C-47 and C-124 type aircraft at Larson Air Force Base, Washington, for the year March 1, 1959-Feb-ruary 29, 1960.

Payment was based on a stated amount for each service performed on each aircraft. In this regard contract No. 441, at Schedule page 4, provided:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baistar Mechanical, Inc. v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 504 (Federal Claims, 2016)
Tecom, Inc. v. United States
66 Fed. Cl. 736 (Federal Claims, 2005)
First Nationwide Bank v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 248 (Federal Claims, 2000)
PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
47 Fed. Cl. 745 (Federal Claims, 2000)
Coast-To-Coast Financial Corp. v. United States
45 Fed. Cl. 796 (Federal Claims, 2000)
Wright Runstad Properties Ltd. Partnership v. United States
42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,294 (Federal Claims, 1998)
Paradise Restaurant, Inc. v. Somerset Enterprises, Inc.
671 A.2d 1258 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1995)
Garrett & Garrett, P.C. v. Commissioner
1993 T.C. Memo. 453 (U.S. Tax Court, 1993)
R.J. Sanders, Inc. v. United States
37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,185 (Court of Claims, 1991)
Troise v. United States
36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,904 (Court of Claims, 1990)
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Elsmere Music, Inc.
633 F. Supp. 487 (S.D. New York, 1986)
C & L Construction Co. v. United States
32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,102 (Court of Claims, 1984)
Aydin Corp. v. United States
669 F.2d 681 (Court of Claims, 1982)
Bromley Contracting Co. v. United States
652 F.2d 70 (Court of Claims, 1981)
Provident National Bank v. United States
507 F. Supp. 1197 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Truong Xuan Truc v. United States
22 Cont. Cas. Fed. 80,065 (Court of Claims, 1976)
Young Associates, Inc. v. United States
471 F.2d 618 (Court of Claims, 1973)
Astro-Space Laboratories, Inc. v. United States
470 F.2d 1003 (Court of Claims, 1972)
Port of Seattle v. United States
450 F.2d 1363 (Court of Claims, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 F.2d 363, 170 Ct. Cl. 346, 1965 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-j-jansen-doing-business-as-mercury-service-v-the-united-states-cc-1965.