FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL AUTHORITY AND STATE GRANTS

Employee protections

49 U.S.C. § 31105
Title49Transportation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL AUTHORITY AND STATE GRANTS

This text of 49 U.S.C. § 31105 (Employee protections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 31105.

Text

(a)Prohibitions.—
(1)A person may not discharge an employee, or discipline or discriminate against an employee regarding pay, terms, or privileges of employment, because—
(A)(i) the employee, or another person at the employee's request, has filed a complaint or begun a proceeding related to a violation of a commercial motor vehicle safety or security regulation, standard, or order, or has testified or will testify in such a proceeding; or
(ii)the person perceives that the employee has filed or is about to file a complaint or has begun or is about to begin a proceeding related to a violation of a commercial motor vehicle safety or security regulation, standard, or order;
(B)the employee refuses to operate a vehicle because—
(i)the operation violates a regulation, standard, or order of t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Commissioner
705 F.3d 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
53 case citations
Maverick Transportation, LLC v. U.S. Department of Labor
739 F.3d 1149 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
17 case citations
Brian Sexton v. Panel Processing, Inc.
754 F.3d 332 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
14 case citations
Hannah P. v. Avril Haines
80 F.4th 236 (Fourth Circuit, 2023)
9 case citations
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor
68 F.4th 1030 (Sixth Circuit, 2023)
6 case citations
Dalton v. United States Department of Labor
58 F. App'x 442 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
4 case citations
Greatwide Dedicated Transport II, LLC v. United States Department of Labor
72 F.4th 544 (Fourth Circuit, 2023)
4 case citations
Roadway Express, Inc. v. Administrative Review Board, U.S. Department of Labor
6 F. App'x 297 (Sixth Circuit, 2001)
2 case citations
Dodds v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
104 F. Supp. 3d 844 (S.D. Texas, 2015)
Mitchell v. Perdido Trucking
(S.D. Alabama, 2024)
Bettner, William v. LABR
(Seventh Circuit, 2008)
Montgomery v. Administrative Review Board
348 F. App'x 915 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Smith v. Department of Labor
(Tenth Circuit, 2019)
Davis v. AIRGAS USA, L.L.C.
(S.D. Texas, 2020)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 990; Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1536, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 464.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a)(1), before clause (A), the words "in any manner" are omitted as surplus. The word "conditions" is omitted as included in "terms". In clauses (A) and (B), the word "rule" is omitted as being synonymous with "regulation". In clause (A), the word "begun" is substituted for "instituted or caused to be instituted" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (B), the words before subclause (i) are substituted for "for refusing to operate a vehicle when" and "or because of" for clarity and consistency. In subclause (ii), the words "vehicle's unsafe condition" are substituted for "unsafe condition of such equipment" for consistency.
Subsection (a)(2) is substituted for 49 App.:2305(b) (2d, last sentences) for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (b)(1), the words "alleging such discharge, discipline, or discrimination" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b)(2)(B), the words "Not later than 30 days after the notice under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph" are substituted for "Thereafter" and "within thirty days" for clarity.
In subsection (b)(2)(C), the words "Before the final order is issued" are substituted for "In the interim" for clarity.
Subsection (b)(3)(A) is substituted for 49 App.:2305(c)(2)(B) (1st sentence) for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (ii), the word "conditions" is omitted as included in "terms". The provision for back pay is moved from clause (ii) to clause (iii) for clarity.
In subsection (b)(3)(B), the words "a sum equal to the aggregate amount of all" and "and expenses" are omitted as surplus. The words "in bringing the complaint" are substituted for "for, or in connection with, the bringing of the complaint upon which the order was issued" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (c), the words "or aggrieved" and "with respect to which the order was issued, allegedly" are omitted as surplus. The words "in accordance with the provisions of chapter 7 of title 5 and" are omitted because 5:ch. 7 applies unless otherwise stated.
In subsection (d), the text of 49 App.:2305(e) (last sentence) is omitted as unnecessary.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2007—Pub. L. 110–53 amended text of section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to, in subsec. (a), prohibition against discharge or discipline of, or discrimination against, an employee regarding pay, terms, or privileges of employment for certain actions, in subsec. (b), procedures for filing of complaint, in subsec. (c), judicial review and venue, and, in subsec. (d), civil action to enforce an order.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Employee Protections
Pub. L. 105–178, title IV, §4023, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 415, provided that, not later than 2 years after June 9, 1998, the Secretary of Transportation, in conjunction with the Secretary of Labor, was to report to Congress on the effectiveness of existing statutory employee protections under this section, with recommendations to address any statutory changes necessary to strengthen the enforcement of these provisions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 31105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/31105.