FEDERAL · 41 U.S.C. · Chapter 67
Required contract terms
41 U.S.C. § 6703
Title41 — Public Contracts
Chapter67 — SERVICE CONTRACT LABOR STANDARDS
This text of 41 U.S.C. § 6703 (Required contract terms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
41 U.S.C. § 6703.
Text
A contract, and bid specification for a contract, to which this chapter applies under section 6702 of this title shall contain the following terms:
(1)Minimum wage.—The contract and bid specification shall contain a provision specifying the minimum wage to be paid to each class of service employee engaged in the performance of the contract or any subcontract, as determined by the Secretary or the Secretary's authorized representative, in accordance with prevailing rates in the locality, or, where a collective-bargaining agreement covers the service employees, in accordance with the rates provided for in the agreement, including prospective wage increases provided for in the agreement as a result of arm's length negotiations. In any case the minimum wage may not be less than the minimum wa
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Call Henry, Inc. v. United States
855 F.3d 1348 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Menocal v. Geo Group, Inc.
113 F. Supp. 3d 1125 (D. Colorado, 2015)
Jose Perez v. Owl, Inc.
110 F.4th 1296 (Eleventh Circuit, 2024)
Tri-County Contractors, Inc. v. Thomas Perez
155 F. Supp. 3d 81 (District of Columbia, 2016)
United States Ex Rel. Conteh v. IKON Office Solutions, Inc.
103 F. Supp. 3d 59 (District of Columbia, 2015)
Garcia v. Skanska USA Bldg., Inc.
324 F. Supp. 3d 76 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc.
(Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 2024)
HD Inc.
(Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 2025)
BAILEY v. DEJOY
(D. Maine, 2021)
Innovative Technologies, Inc.
(Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 2023)
BCFS Health and Human Services v. United States Department of Labor
(W.D. Texas, 2022)
Irizarry v. Innovative Technologies, Inc.
(District of Columbia, 2024)
Oliverio-Still v. AVMAC LLC
(S.D. California, 2025)
Wayne Holstad v. U.S. Dept. of Labor
(Eighth Circuit, 2022)
Williams v. Enterprise Resource Planning International, LLC
(S.D. California, 2025)
Green v. Opm
(Federal Circuit, 2020)
Holstad v. United States Department of Labor
(D. Minnesota, 2021)
International Auto Logistics, LLC v. Vehicle Processing Center of Fayetteville, Inc.
(Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
Centerra Group, LLC f/k/a The Wackenhut Services, Inc.
(Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 2018)
Menjivar Garcia v. Skanska USA Building Inc.
(District of Columbia, 2018)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3812.)
Editorial Notes
Executive Documents
Executive Order No. 13495
Ex. Ord. No. 13495, Jan. 30, 2009, 74 F.R. 6103, which provided for nondisplacement of qualified workers under a successor service contract upon the expiration of the predecessor contract, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 13897, §1, Oct. 31, 2019, 84 F.R. 59709, formerly set out below.
Executive Order No. 13897
Ex. Ord. No. 13897, Oct. 31, 2019, 84 F.R. 59709, which related to the revocation of Ex. Ord. No. 13495, formerly set out above, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 14055, §9, Nov. 18, 2021, 86 F.R. 66400, set out below.
Executive Order No. 14055
Ex. Ord. No. 14055, Nov. 18, 2021, 86 F.R. 66397, which required agencies to ensure that service contracts and subcontracts that succeed a contract for performance of the same or similar work, and solicitations for such contracts and subcontracts, include a clause requiring the contractor and its subcontractors offer a right of first refusal of employment to service employees employed under the predecessor contract and its subcontracts, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 14148, §2(qq), Jan. 20, 2025, 90 F.R. 8239.
Executive Order No. 13495
Ex. Ord. No. 13495, Jan. 30, 2009, 74 F.R. 6103, which provided for nondisplacement of qualified workers under a successor service contract upon the expiration of the predecessor contract, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 13897, §1, Oct. 31, 2019, 84 F.R. 59709, formerly set out below.
Executive Order No. 13897
Ex. Ord. No. 13897, Oct. 31, 2019, 84 F.R. 59709, which related to the revocation of Ex. Ord. No. 13495, formerly set out above, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 14055, §9, Nov. 18, 2021, 86 F.R. 66400, set out below.
Executive Order No. 14055
Ex. Ord. No. 14055, Nov. 18, 2021, 86 F.R. 66397, which required agencies to ensure that service contracts and subcontracts that succeed a contract for performance of the same or similar work, and solicitations for such contracts and subcontracts, include a clause requiring the contractor and its subcontractors offer a right of first refusal of employment to service employees employed under the predecessor contract and its subcontracts, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 14148, §2(qq), Jan. 20, 2025, 90 F.R. 8239.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
41 U.S.C. § 6703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/41/6703.