FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

Art. 41. Challenges

10 U.S.C. § 841
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 841 (Art. 41. Challenges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 841.

Text

(a)(1) The military judge and members of a general or special court-martial may be challenged by the accused or the trial counsel for cause stated to the court. The military judge shall determine the relevancy and validity of challenges for cause, and may not receive a challenge to more than one person at a time. Challenges by the trial counsel shall ordinarily be presented and decided before those by the accused are offered.
(2)If exercise of a challenge for cause reduces the court below the number of members required by section 816 of this title (article 16), all parties shall (notwithstanding section 829 of this title (article 29)) either exercise or waive any challenge for cause then apparent against the remaining members of the court before additional members are detailed to the cour

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gooch
69 M.J. 353 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2011)
227 case citations
United States v. Wiesen
56 M.J. 172 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2001)
116 case citations
United States v. Gray
51 M.J. 1 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1999)
105 case citations
United States v. Harris
13 M.J. 288 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
79 case citations
United States v. Curtis
44 M.J. 106 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1996)
71 case citations
United States v. Armstrong
54 M.J. 51 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2000)
67 case citations
United States v. Tulloch
47 M.J. 283 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1997)
48 case citations
United States v. Carter
25 M.J. 471 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1988)
44 case citations
United States v. Miles
58 M.J. 192 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2003)
37 case citations
United States v. Norfleet
53 M.J. 262 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2000)
36 case citations
United States v. Dobson
63 M.J. 1 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2006)
36 case citations
United States v. Witham
47 M.J. 297 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1997)
36 case citations
United States v. Cruz
10 C.M.A. 458 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
31 case citations
United States v. Cleveland
15 C.M.A. 213 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1965)
31 case citations
United States v. Quintanilla
63 M.J. 29 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2006)
29 case citations
United States v. Ruiz
49 M.J. 340 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1998)
28 case citations
United States v. Waldron
15 C.M.A. 628 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1966)
25 case citations
United States v. Rojas
15 M.J. 902 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1983)
23 case citations
United States v. Lavender
46 M.J. 485 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1997)
20 case citations
United States v. Miller
19 M.J. 159 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1985)
19 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 51; Pub. L. 90–632, §2(17), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1339; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, §541(b)–(d), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1565; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title X, §1075(b)(13), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4369; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVII, §5224, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2909.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the word "may" is substituted for the word "shall" before the words "not receive".
In subsection (b), the word "the" is inserted before the word "trial". The word "is" is substituted for the words "shall be". The word "may" is substituted for the word "shall".

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2016—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 114–328, §5224(1), struck out ", or, if none, the court," before "shall determine".
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 114–328, §5224(2), struck out "minimum" after "below the".
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 114–328, §5224(3), struck out "minimum" after "below the".
2011—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–383 substituted "trial counsel" for "trail counsel".
1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–510, §541(b), designated existing provision as par. (1) and added par. (2).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–510, §541(c), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "Each accused and the trial counsel is entitled to one peremptory challenge, but the military judge may not be challenged except for cause."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–510, §541(d), added subsec. (c).
1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–632, §2(17)(A), (B), inserted reference to the military judge and struck out references to the law officer of a general court-martial.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–632, §2(17)(C), substituted "military judge" for "law officer".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 1990 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 101–510 applicable only to court-martial convened on or after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 541(e) of Pub. L. 101–510, set out as a note under section 839 of this title.

Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/841.