FEDERAL · 6 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VIII—COORDINATION WITH NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES; INSPECTOR GENERAL; UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; COAST GUARD; GENERAL PROVISIONS
Increased simplified acquisition threshold for procurements in support of humanitarian or peacekeeping operations or contingency operations
6 U.S.C. § 423
Title6 — Domestic Security
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VIII—COORDINATION WITH NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES; INSPECTOR GENERAL; UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; COAST GUARD; GENERAL PROVISIONS
PartF
This text of 6 U.S.C. § 423 (Increased simplified acquisition threshold for procurements in support of humanitarian or peacekeeping operations or contingency operations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
6 U.S.C. § 423.
Text
(a)Temporary threshold amounts
For a procurement referred to in section 422 of this title that is carried out in support of a humanitarian or peacekeeping operation or a contingency operation, the simplified acquisition threshold definitions shall be applied as if the amount determined under the exception provided for such an operation in those definitions were—
(1)in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, inside the United States, $200,000; or
(2)in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, outside the United States, $300,000.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Salazar v. Dudek
(E.D. Washington, 2025)
Jose Zermano v. Nancy A. Berryhill
(C.D. California, 2020)
Vader v. Social Security Administration
(S.D. California, 2020)
Kovach v. Berryhill
(S.D. California, 2019)
Ly v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2023)
Hector v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2022)
Sepulveda v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2022)
Asis R. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. Washington, 2025)
Antoine v. O'Malley
(E.D. Washington, 2024)
I. v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2022)
Daigneau v.Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2021)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. Washington, 2020)
Biddick v. Saul
(E.D. Washington, 2020)
Harris v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2022)
Jessup v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2022)
Jones v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2023)
Swanberg v. O'Malley
(E.D. Washington, 2023)
Lewis v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2023)
Hahn Jr v. Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. Washington, 2019)
White v. Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. Washington, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §853, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2235; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1702(c)(2), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2155.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–81 added pars. (1) to (3) and struck out former pars. (1) to (3) which read as follows:
"(1) Section 4(11) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(11)).
"(2) Section 309(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 259(d)).
"(3) Section 2302(7) of title 10."
Amendments
2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–81 added pars. (1) to (3) and struck out former pars. (1) to (3) which read as follows:
"(1) Section 4(11) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(11)).
"(2) Section 309(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 259(d)).
"(3) Section 2302(7) of title 10."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 U.S.C. § 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/6/423.