FEDERAL · 6 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Increased simplified acquisition threshold for procurements in support of humanitarian or peacekeeping operations or contingency operations
Current through Pub. L. 119-99
(a)Temporary threshold amounts
For a procurement referred to in section 422 of this title that is carried out in support of a humanitarian or peacekeeping operation or a contingency operation, the simplified acquisition threshold definitions shall be applied as if the amount determined under the exception provided for such an operation in those definitions were—
(1)in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, inside the United States, $200,000; or
(2)in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, outside the United States, $300,000.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
6 U.S.C. § 423 (Increased simplified acquisition threshold for procurements in support of humanitarian or peacekeeping operations or contingency operations) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Salazar v. Dudek
(E.D. Washington, 2025)
Jose Zermano v. Nancy A. Berryhill
(C.D. California, 2020)
Vader v. Social Security Administration
(S.D. California, 2020)
Kovach v. Berryhill
(S.D. California, 2019)
Ly v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2023)
Hector v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2022)
Sepulveda v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2022)
Asis R. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. Washington, 2025)
Antoine v. O'Malley
(E.D. Washington, 2024)
I. v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2022)
Daigneau v.Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2021)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. Washington, 2020)
Biddick v. Saul
(E.D. Washington, 2020)
Harris v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2022)
Jessup v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2022)
Jones v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2023)
Swanberg v. O'Malley
(E.D. Washington, 2023)
Lewis v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2023)
Hahn Jr v. Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. Washington, 2019)
White v. Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. Washington, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §853, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2235; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1702(c)(2), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2155.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–81 added pars. (1) to (3) and struck out former pars. (1) to (3) which read as follows:
"(1) Section 4(11) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(11)).
"(2) Section 309(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 259(d)).
"(3) Section 2302(7) of title 10."
Amendments
2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–81 added pars. (1) to (3) and struck out former pars. (1) to (3) which read as follows:
"(1) Section 4(11) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(11)).
"(2) Section 309(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 259(d)).
"(3) Section 2302(7) of title 10."