FEDERAL · 6 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VIII—COORDINATION WITH NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES; INSPECTOR GENERAL; UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; COAST GUARD; GENERAL PROVISIONS

Increased simplified acquisition threshold for procurements in support of humanitarian or peacekeeping operations or contingency operations

6 U.S.C. § 423
Title6Domestic Security
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VIII—COORDINATION WITH NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES; INSPECTOR GENERAL; UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; COAST GUARD; GENERAL PROVISIONS
PartF

This text of 6 U.S.C. § 423 (Increased simplified acquisition threshold for procurements in support of humanitarian or peacekeeping operations or contingency operations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
6 U.S.C. § 423.

Text

(a)Temporary threshold amounts For a procurement referred to in section 422 of this title that is carried out in support of a humanitarian or peacekeeping operation or a contingency operation, the simplified acquisition threshold definitions shall be applied as if the amount determined under the exception provided for such an operation in those definitions were—
(1)in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, inside the United States, $200,000; or
(2)in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, outside the United States, $300,000.
(b)Simplified acquisition threshold definitions In this section, the term "simplified acquisition threshold definitions" means the following:
(1)Section 134 of title 41.
(2)Section 153 of t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salazar v. Dudek
(E.D. Washington, 2025)
Jose Zermano v. Nancy A. Berryhill
(C.D. California, 2020)
Kovach v. Berryhill
(S.D. California, 2019)
Ly v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2023)
Hector v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2022)
Sepulveda v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2022)
Antoine v. O'Malley
(E.D. Washington, 2024)
I. v. Kijakazi
(N.D. California, 2022)
Daigneau v.Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2021)
Biddick v. Saul
(E.D. Washington, 2020)
Harris v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2022)
Jessup v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2022)
Jones v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2023)
Swanberg v. O'Malley
(E.D. Washington, 2023)
Lewis v. Kijakazi
(E.D. Washington, 2023)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §853, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2235; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1702(c)(2), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2155.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–81 added pars. (1) to (3) and struck out former pars. (1) to (3) which read as follows:
"(1) Section 4(11) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(11)).
"(2) Section 309(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 259(d)).
"(3) Section 2302(7) of title 10."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 U.S.C. § 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/6/423.