§ 37-1-104 — Concurrent jurisdiction

Tennessee § 37-1-104

• Jurisdiction: Tennessee
• Title: 37

Text

(a) The juvenile court has concurrent jurisdiction with the probate court of proceedings to: (1) Treat or commit a developmentally disabled or mentally ill child; (2) Determine the custody or appoint a guardian of the person of a child; and (3) Give judicial consent to the marriage of a child if consent is required by law. (b) The juvenile court has concurrent jurisdiction with the general sessions court for the offenses of contributing to the delinquency or unruly conduct of a minor as defined in § 37-1-156 and contributing to the dependency of a minor as defined in § 37-1-157 . (c) The juvenile, circuit and chancery courts have concurrent jurisdiction to terminate parental or guardian rights pursuant to the provisions of title 36, chapter 1, part 1. (d) (1) (A) The juvenile court has concurrent jurisdiction and statewide jurisdiction with other courts having the jurisdiction to order support for minor children and shall have statewide jurisdiction over the parties involved in the case. (B) In intrastate cases, jurisdiction to modify, alter or enforce orders or decrees for the support of children shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of title 36, chapter 5, parts 30 and 31. (C) In any political subdivision or judicial district of the state in which a court by contract is the agency designated to provide child support enforcement pursuant to Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, compiled in 42 U.S.C. §§ 651 et seq., and if a judge with child support jurisdiction in that political subdivision or judicial district agrees, the contracting court shall have jurisdiction in any case in such judge's court in which an application is made for assistance in obtaining support under this part. Upon application being made for child support enforcement assistance as provided by law, the contracting court shall assume jurisdiction and it is the duty of the court clerk to so notify the clerk of any court having prior jurisdiction. The contracting court shall then proceed to make and enforce such orders of support as it deems proper within its jurisdiction pursuant to the agreement. The contracting court shall not have jurisdiction in any case in which an absent parent is in full compliance with a support order of another court. (2) In any case in which the court has exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction to order the payment of child support, the court may issue a child support order when requested by a party. All provisions of title 36, chapter 5 that relate to child support or child support orders that include an order of spousal support and § 50-2-105 apply to support orders issued in these proceedings. (e) The juvenile court has concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit and chancery court of proceedings arising from the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. (f) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the juvenile court has concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit and chancery court of proceedings to establish the paternity of children born out of lawful wedlock and to determine any custody, visitation, support, education or other issues regarding the care and control of children born out of wedlock. The court further has the power to enforce its orders. Nothing in this subsection (f) shall be construed as vesting the circuit and chancery court with jurisdiction over matters that are in the exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court under § 37-1-103 . (g) The juvenile court and the circuit and criminal court have concurrent jurisdiction in proceedings in which a child is alleged to have committed an act that would, if adjudicated delinquent, require the child to be classified as a serious youthful offender pursuant to § 37-1-131(g) .

Legislative History

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1007,s 3, eff. 1/1/2025, app. to all costs submitted for reimbursement on or after July 1, 2011. Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 600, s 1, eff. 7/1/2016. Acts 1970, ch. 600, § 4; 1971, ch. 189, § 3; 1975, ch. 248, § 34; 1980, ch. 838, § 4; 1981, ch. 348, § 2; 1983, ch. 453, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A., § 37-204; Acts 1985, ch. 477, § 16; 1989, ch. 206, § 2; 1995, ch. 416, § 1; 1995, ch. 532, § 8; 1997 , ch. 551, § 9; imp. am. Acts 2000, ch. 947, § 6; 2003 , ch. 333, § 2.